The question in the “Frozen Trucker Case” was one of statutory interpretation and not the Constitution. Gorsuch believed the statute in question spoke directly to the question in not protecting the trucker from being fired.

Again, I feel Gorsuch was wrong, but presuming his argument that the statute spoke directly to the question is correct, then I agree with him that it is not his job to come to a different conclusion than the mandate of the statute in the interest of “the human part of the equation.” If the result is something you feel is inhumane, the fault for that resides in those who wrote the law.

Judges should not superimpose their own moral views when deciding what the law says.

Written by

Retired lawyer & Army vet in The Villages of Florida. Lifelong: Republican (pre-Trump), Constitution buff, science nerd & dog lover. Twitter: @KeithDB80

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store